Government vs. Parents

Government vs. Parents

Q:

Several Christian leaders from groups such as the Florida Catholic Conference and the family-advocacy group the Eagle Forum are reportedly concerned about a Florida bill that would require 11- and 12-year-old girls to be vaccinated against sexually transmitted diseases. They argue that the bill promotes promiscuity. The bill's proponents, which include Democrat and Republican Florida lawmakers, say the bill could be a lifesaver because the vaccine — called Gardasil — blocks four types of the sexually transmitted human papillomavirus, which causes genital warts and a large percentage of cervical cancer cases. What do you think of the bill?

A:

Cancer — any kind — is an ugly disease. Any clergyman who has spent any time holding the hand of a dying patient and counseling the wounded family has undoubtedly said a prayer to find a cure for such a dreaded disease.

Yes, even though cancer therapy has come a long way, no one will argue that the occurrence of cancer continues to devastate individuals and their families.

If a vaccine can prevent cancer, we need to be thankful that we are one step closer to eradicating a horrible disease, especially its cervical variety. I do not buy the argument that this will promote promiscuity among teens. If it does, then are we to assume the opposite it true? That is, will the unavailability of the vaccine lead to less promiscuity among youth?

In a world where children are bombarded with sexual content 24/7, the threat of casual and dangerous sex is unavoidable. It is all around us. Sex sells and it is being used to market everything to everyone, including our children. The real challenge for clergy and people of faith is to engage parents in a dialogue with their children about sex and sexual expressions.

This dialogue is not the responsibility of government, but one which falls in the sacred category of parenting.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN
Armenian Church Youth Ministries
In His Shoes Mission

New Year's Resolution/Wish for 2007: Prayer

Published December 30, 2006

IN THEORY

New Year's Resolution/Wish for 2007

Q:

What's your New Year's resolution/wish for 2007?

A:

If anything, I wish for more prayer in my life. It seems like everything is progressing in fast motion these days. It's hard to believe that we're seven years into the new century. (Seems like yesterday that we were cautiously anticipating Y2K?) And life has become very cluttered with "stuff" to do. Multi-tasking has become the norm rather than the exception to the day's activities.

Prayer is a means of focusing, of prioritizing and then attacking life head-on. It's an incredible tool which is so underrated, perhaps because it is misconstrued as a conversation with God rather than a multidimensional exchange of thought and energy. Jesus teaches that our prayers should not only be conversations with the Divine but also with ourselves. In fact, one of the Orthodox teachings on prayer emphasizes Christ's caution to not heap "empty phrases... for your Father knows what you need before you ask him." (Matthew 6.7-8) Clearly, if God knows our needs, then the purpose of prayer is for us - ourselves - to recognize what is important in life. Once we prioritize, then we are able to efficiently deal with what life throws at us.

On the eve of 2007, it is disheartening to note the many problems facing our world and our society. We enter the New Year with war, poverty and disease all around us. It is overwhelming. And so my wish for 2007 is that we pray, realizing that prayer should awaken our sense of responsibility toward the world we live in.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN
Armenian Church
In His Shoes Mission

Remembering the Meaning of Christmas

Published December 16, 2006 IN THEORY Remembering the Meaning of Christmas Q: With the holidays upon us, do you find yourselves getting caught up in the frenzy over shopping and gifts and all the related hustle and bustle? How do you deal with it, and do you worry that the true messages of the season get lost? A: A quick look around the world will point to the lost message of Christmas. It's difficult to imagine war in Iraq, genocide in Darfur or just plain intolerance toward our neighbors if the message was taken seriously. In our own backyard, would we be consumed with petty politics, rather than showing concern for the health and education of our children, if the message of Christmas was more than the decorations at the Galleria? Yet, the fundamental message of Christmas is that of hope. It's a trust and faith in tomorrow, beyond our understanding. That is the promise of the Christ child: that God continues to nurture and save us, despite ourselves. At our parish, St. Peter, we challenge our congregation to celebrate the birth of Christ by giving him the gifts he requests. We find his shopping list in Luke 14:12-14: "Give to those," Jesus says, "the poor and suffering - those who have no means of paying you back." It is a simple way to emphasize the message of Christmas. Furthermore, as Armenians we celebrate the Nativity on Jan. 6. Because we have a double Christmas, we have made it a policy at our church to acknowledge and live the Christmas message all year round. The celebration of "Love being born" is not confined to a date, but it is a way of life. We established the "In His Shoes Mission," which provides a constant challenge for members to rise from their humanity and live the Christmas message all year long. By walking in the shoes of others, we acknowledge and realize that it is up to us to work for a better tomorrow. Therein, we tie ourselves to the message of hope that is Christmas. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church In His Shoes Mission

Nativity Story: Learning from Mary

Published December 2, 2006 IN THEORY Nativity Story: Learning from Mary Q: A new movie, "The Nativity Story," puts a new spotlight on the life of Jesus' mother, Mary. It even reportedly has Protestants using the movie to talk more about Mary -- discussion that has reportedly in the past gone by the wayside in some religious circles. What can we learn from Mary? Has she been ignored? A: In the Armenian Orthodox tradition we refer to St. Mary as "Asdvadzadzin" which literally means the "Bearer of God." It is akin to the Greek word, "Theotokos" which is her title in the Orthodox Christian world. She has a unique position among the saints, because from her Love is born. St. Mary's message is simple, yet difficult. At a time when women were not much more than property, when the punishment for pre-marital pregnancy was capital (usually by stoning), Mary answers the call to give birth to the Christ child by saying, "Let it be to me, according to your word." (Luke 2) This 'yes' is unique in all of history, because in it we find humility, sacrifice and submission to God's will. In a word, St. Mary's "yes" is the articulation of Love. As a result, Love was born from her. Today, St. Mary's example must challenge all of us. We are called to give "birth to love" everyday, in our relationships and our lives. The consequences are sometimes just as difficult as those faced by the Holy Virgin. Saying 'yes' to God means dropping the ego and humbling ourselves. It means sacrificing for others, rather than holding on to selfish desires. It involves nurturing love within us so that it can be born of our actions. Hers is a formula for peace. Hers is a birthplace for love. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church In His Shoes Mission

Public vs. Private Education

Published November 18, 2006 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Public vs. Private Education

Q:

Jews and Catholics are reportedly calling for government policies and funding that would allow parents to send their children to private schools with the aid of public funds. The idea is to help parents meet the high cost of religious schools. Critics say vouchers take money away from public schools and funnel it to private religious schools, unfairly. What do you think? Should the government money go to such a cause?

A:

I approach the issue of public vs. private education from a different perspective because most of my work is with families and students that are confounded by the public school system. I have also administered a parochial day school, and know that there are trade-offs for the 'luxury' of private education.

But as a priest, I hope to add a religious dimension to this debate, which goes beyond a mere exercise in funding parochial agendas. Private schools and the debate over vouchers are an indictment of the failings of public schools. This becomes more apparent as more and more parents opt for parochial education for their children, not on dogmatic grounds as much as on quality of education and safety issues.

The fundamental philosophy of education should be to pass along knowledge to subsequent generations, to form the building blocks to tomorrow's society. But what good is building society only to have it toppled by misdirected political motives? Vouchers do not take away money from education, rather it is the massive budgets for destruction and war that devastate our classrooms and even greater, prevent us from dreaming of a better tomorrow.

We need to be talking about our direction as a society. This is not a discussion of private vs. public education. Instead, it's about prioritizing the challenge to provide the best education for everyone. We have the money to do this, vouchers or not. We need to rework our budgets so that spending is off-balance in favor of the classroom rather than military growth. Investing in our children will bring a much better and a higher yield than investing in the destruction of foreign governments and lands. Our military spending is no longer confined under "defense" and so, let us be honest and talk about the best offensive strategy for our country. I believe we can find it in educating our children so that they dream of better tomorrows for us, our society and our world.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN
Armenian Church
In His Shoes Mission

Chaplains and Religious Liberty

Published October 21, 2006 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Chaplains and Religious Liberty

Q:

Secretary of the Navy Donald C. Winter reportedly issued instructions to Navy chaplains earlier this year that religious portions of events such as graduations or command changes should be "nonsectarian in nature" and that chaplains must "be willing to function in a pluralistic environment." The instructions have prompted a debate about whether a chaplain's ability to express his or her faith is justified in a secular setting and whether phrases such as "praying in Jesus' name" during an invocation could offend the ranks.The move has concerned members of Congress and evangelicals, who say that any restriction on religious liberty restricts their freedom of religion. They propose legislation that would allows chaplains to practice their faith, even in nonsectarian settings. What do you think? Do you think there should be such legislation? Or do you think the Navy secretary's direction was warranted?

A:

You can't have a "religious" portion to an event that is "nonsectarian." This violates definitions.

You certainly can ask a chaplain to be considerate of the various traditions present at an event, but all prayers conjure sectarian images.

Everyone has a unique set of beliefs. Religion is the expression of those beliefs. Even atheism involves a set of beliefs, if not in anything, at least in the self that is able to contemplate these thoughts. A chaplain is a person who represents a particular tradition with a unique set of instructions for expression.

Unfortunately, at many of public events, prayers and invocations are ceremonial and lack any depth or meaning. They are meant to showcase a particular allegiance by a politician or to appease a certain constituency. And in so doing, inevitably, someone is offended.

A true prayer cannot be offensive because it talks to the depths of the human experience. It conjures images of attainable dreams, such as peace and justice. It crosses all boundaries, sectarian, secular and denominational.

FR. VAZKEN MOVSESIAN
Armenian Church
In His Shoes Mission

Jesus Camp: Teaching Truth or Extremism

Published October 7, 2006 IN THEORY Jesus Camp: Teaching Truth or Extremism Q: Pope Benedict last week visited Veronica's Veil, which some Christians say was used to wipe the blood and sweat off of Jesus' face on his way to his crucifixion. It was a pope's first visit to the shrine in Manoppello, Italy, where the veil is said to bear the true likeness of Christ's face — a likeness that reportedly resembles the likeness on the Shroud of Turin. The pope stopped short of endorsing the image as that of Christ.But do you believe this likeness and others, like the shroud, are true depictions of Christ? What are your thoughts on what Christ looked like? A: When discussing "Jesus Camp," the word "zealous" comes to mind. It's a word derived from a first-century Jewish sect known as the "Zealots," a group formed in reaction to the occupation of the land of Israel and eventually led the revolt against Rome (66-70 AD). The Zealots could not accept their land being ruled by any principle other than the authority of God. At least one of Jesus' disciples, Simon, was a member of the Zealots. I suspect that Pastor Becky Fischer, her group and the countless other denominations that align themselves with her teachings, understand the United States being "occupied" and ruled by principles that are in conflict with God's commandments. And here lies the problem, because you can only approach such an idea subjectively. How dare we answer the question, what is the will of God? To teach a six-day-creation? That the war in Iraq is justified? That homelessness is acceptable in every major city? Secondly, I need to comment on the target audience of the "Jesus Camp." Children don't need religion. They need faith. They need to believe in hope and love. As so called "mature" people, we need to offer our children stability, not chaos. What amazes me the most is our audacity to teach young children about religion. Have we created a good enough world that we're ready to pass along the systems by which we've arrived here? Or do we need to pause and pay heed to the words of Jesus: "Let the little children come to me, for to such belong the Kingdom of God" (Matthew 19). Our children can teach us a thing or two about life that we've forgotten. I would like to attend a "Jesus Camp" run by the children who can teach us what comes so naturally to them. Things such as, forgiving and forgetting just a short while after they have been hurt, or noticing small miracles such as a frog jumping. Mostly, they can teach us to trust and depend on each other — building the community — something which is the basis of all true religion. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church In His Shoes Mission