Morality of Genocide Non-Recognition?

Published April 29, 2006

IN THEORY

Morality of Genocide Non-Recognition?

Q: We are coming off of a week in which Armenians and Jews remember the genocide of their ancestors. Yet, in the case of the Armenian Genocide, the American government has not recognized it officially. Does the government have a moral responsibility to officially recognize this part of history? If so, is such recognition important from a religious point of view?

A: Morality is not the prime motivator for governments. Arguably, politics precludes moral responsibility. And certainly, moral responsibility will always get sent to the back burner while political agendas brew.

The Armenian Genocide is not up for debate. It doesn't need any more proof.

The extermination of the Armenian people was systematically orchestrated by the Turkish government. The press, the New York Times in particular, wrote about it. Visitors in Turkey, including the U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau, witnessed it. And the bones, remains and spirits of 1.5 million Armenian souls lay as a testament to it.

Recognition does not validate the event. Recognition gives people an opportunity to express their humanity in the face of grave tragedy. In this respect it behooves every religious body to recognize the tragedy of others.

By doing so, they elevate their congregation to new heights. By recognizing the tragedy of others we begin to understand, we accept, we learn, we grow.

Recognition brings harmony among people. It lays the foundation to lasting peace.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries