Saturday, December 17, 2005

Cruel & Unusual Punishment?

Question for December 17, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: Before he was executed this week, many argued that Stanley Tookie Williams had been rehabilitated. Others argued that his lack of contrition and the nature of his crimes justifiably doomed him to execution. Do you agree? Is the death penalty a morally acceptable form of punishment?

A: By the time this article is printed, talk of Tookie will be at a minimum, if there is a murmur about him at all. The greatest tragedy associated with the death penalty is that it desensitizes us to death and therefore life. We begin to think that justice can be delivered as a commodity - an eye-for-an-eye - rather than a response which warrants sensitivity, especially for the victims!

Today a great injustice is happening in Darfur. Tens of thousands of people are being murdered just as they were being killed in Rwanda a decade ago. It's not that we don't care; it's just that we've become so immune to killings and violence that we understand life as numbers rather than flesh, blood and souls. And when the State executes someone, we receive a booster shot to our immune system. So four days later we've forgotten about Tookie, subsequently, we close our eyes to mass murder such as Genocide.

Stan Tookie Williams died. Four others died because he shot them. Hundreds of others have been and are being killed by gang violence. Over a 2000 of our troops have died in Iraq. And on the "other" side, 30,000 Iraqis have died since the start of the war. Add to that the 29,000 kids who die each day because of hunger and the statistics and numerical values of life and death become overwhelming to the point of desensitization. So when we hear that 1.5 million Armenian were murdered in the Genocide of 1915, we accept it as a statistic to history, rather than a call to action against injustice in the world.

It all begins when we tune-out the value of the life of one man, even if he be a criminal. John Donne described it so eloquently, "No man is an island entire of itself. Every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main... Any man's death diminishes me because I am involved in mankind; therefore never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee."

The Death Penalty does not bring about justice. It only punishes us, those who remain to see another injustice.


FR. VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Saturday, December 10, 2005

Taking the Christ out of Christmas

Published December 10, 2005 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Q: Commentator Bill O'Reilly is on a campaign to promote the use of the holiday greeting "Merry Christmas" in retail stores, reflecting a concern that outlets are replacing the greeting with non-denominational sayings such as "Happy Holidays." Do you think secular forces are wiping out such seasonal displays? Are you offended by the lack of the word "Christmas" in such displays and advertising?

A: Corporate America and the "secular forces" are doing a great job of removing Christ from Christmas, but it's not because of a reference to a generic holiday. Frankly, as a Christian I'm offended and even insulted by some of the signs that label their products with Christmas banners.

What makes a cruise a "Christmas cruise?" Do they have a plastic nativity tucked away in the corner of the dining hall? What makes the car dealer proclaim a "Christmas Sale"? Is it the big red bow over the car, or the Bible in the glove compartment? And what about the "Christmas Sale of Scotch Whiskey"? After the drunk driver kills innocent people are we to be comforted that he was returning from a Christmas party?

Christ was taken out of Christmas long ago. Whether advertisers use the word Christmas or holiday is really insignificant because what we've lost is not the word or even the person of Christ, but the message. The celebration of Christmas, with trees and ornaments, with gifts and giving, is all about a sacred relationship that we enjoy with God. The message of Christmas is all about giving to those who have absolutely no way of giving back to us -- the poor, the hungry, the starving and the sick. After all, the example was given to us on that first Christmas, when God gave to us, something so sacred, knowing that we had and have no way to return the gift, only by giving to others.

So Happy Holidays, Kwanza, Hanukkah, Winter Solstice and Merry Christmas.

Buy, spend and give. It's good for the economy and be comforted knowing that retailers rely on Christmas for their survival in much the same way we rely on God for ours.

FR. VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Saturday, December 3, 2005

A Tangled Web of Morality

Published December 3, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: An orthodox Jewish community in Lakewood, N.J., has banned the Internet for families that have school-age children, citing concern over access to sexual images. Under the ban, students with home access to the Web face expulsion from the area's Jewish private schools. What do you think of this policy, and the Web's effect on morality?

A: The Web is a tool -- a means -- by which information is passed along. It is like asking, what is the effect of a hammer on a wall. It depends on the person using it, the place of impact, type of nail and so on. The Web is a means by which good and bad information comes to us.

The critical issue at hand is that the Web is vast, global and the "bad" is no longer a subjective issue. So its use by vulnerable children should be monitored. The community in New Jersey is exercising its voice on matters of morality.

They should be commended for doing so whether we agree or disagree with the policy. As orthodox Jews, this community is saying that their standard is different and does not have a place for the trash that pollutes the mind of so many.

This is where the religious community (not government) should be.

And ultimately it is the followers of that religion that will decide whether to belong. Hence, it is up to parents (again, not government) to accept or reject those guidelines as it pertains to their children.

For me, the opportunities afforded by the Internet are tremendous in terms of evangelization and communication.

Every rose has thorns but with proper pruning and care, you can preserve and present the beauty of the flower without damaging its integrity. As with all of life, the challenge for us is to use and not abuse the wonders that are around us.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Saturday, November 19, 2005

Taxing time for political sermons

Published November 19, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: The IRS has reportedly warned a high-profile church in Pasadena that it could lose its tax-exempt status because of an anti-war sermon from a guest speaker. What are your thoughts on this? Are you concerned about the line between religion and politics in your own sermons, and how crossing that line could single out a church or a temple?

A: There's something wrong here and it is bigger than the Internal Revenue Service threatening a church with a change in tax status. A few months ago when Pat Robertson openly called for the assassination of democratically elected president of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez Frías, was there a similar investigation of his religious credentials?

Or was he donning the hat of a politician and therefore protected by another set of rules?

And what about the mosques, synagogues and churches where hatred toward others is preached, advocated or even tolerated? Why are these institutions granted refuge under tax-exempt laws?

In the case of All Saints Episcopal Church, they are being singled out, and it is obvious. The truth is, I can't imagine a church being a church, without it championing peace and justice. I can't even imagine a clergyman, whether priest, minister, rabbi or imam, who can dare to stand in the sight of God and not preach peace and work for a world without war. I can't imagine this because I can't imagine Jesus standing for anything that would denigrate the sanctity of life.

Since our country was founded, issues of freedom, justice, peace and humanitarian duty have all been debated in the pulpits, in the pews and the forums established by the religious community. Run the course of history to the present and you will see the same for every time we have been confronted with challenges that touch the core of our liberty as a nation. Imagine where Civil Rights would be had it not been for Martin Luther King who leaned on his faith to build a movement for equality.

Today, the Church must continue with the same zeal and enthusiasm to be an advocate for the poor and the oppressed, to lead the way to justice and peace. If the government is set on stifling the Church's voice, it must have the courage to continue even at the cost of losing its nonprofit privileges. We hope that it will not come to this and so, we all need to accept the All Saints battle as our own. All Saints, their ministry and congregation are in our prayers.

FR. VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Saturday, November 5, 2005

When drugs and religion collide

Published November 5, 2005 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Q: The Supreme Court this week heard arguments in a case that brings up the question of whether the nation's drug laws should ever trump religious freedom. In Gonzales vs. O Centro Espirita Beneficiente Uniao Do Vegetal, the court could reportedly grapple with what happens when a religious ceremony requires consumption of a drug outlawed under the Controlled Substances Act.

The case involves a New Mexico religious sect of 130 members that uses a tea made of hallucinogenic substances banned in the U.S. But this sacramental tea has been likened to the wine at a Roman Catholic Mass or unleavened bread at a Passover Seder. What do you think? Do the nation's drug laws supersede religion in this context?

A: From as early as the 19th century, the courts have distinguished between religious beliefs and religious practices or actions. While beliefs are granted the full protection of the constitution, not so with actions, as is evidenced in the current issue regarding the use of "sacramental drugs."

During the Prohibition era, sacramental users of wine were exempt from the general prohibition laws and the element, which was transformed through religious practices into the blood of Christ, was secured through governmental resources. I imagine the same type of procedures can be adopted for the procurement of hallucinogens today.

This case is going to be a good test for our system. Sure it will answer questions about the extent of law and religious freedom, but it will answer even greater issues of tolerance and relativism. And the outcome may catch a lot of people off guard.

While many believe that heightening awareness of God via chemicals is sacrilege, we can only see ourselves on the other side of the looking glass, and the bizarre world of religion, that justifies many profane behaviors in the name of the divine. It gives us another opportunity to consider Marx's assessment that religion is the opium of the people.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Saturday, October 22, 2005

Is Revelation relevant to current times?

Published October 22, 2005 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Q: With the recent spate of natural disasters and the potential of pandemics, talk of the end times has heated up. Speculation about the end of the world has become the topic of blogs and evangelists. What are your thoughts on the Book of Revelation in relation to our current age? Do you believe in the prophecy of the end times, or not? Are the disasters more than natural?

A: It never ceases to amaze me how quick people are to latch on to the prophetic aspects of faith and ignore the practical fundamentals that are essential to quality living.

The Book of Revelation is not meant to be read as a guide for the end times. It was written in prison by the Apostle John while most Christians were suffering and enduring violent persecution toward the end of the first century. Its message is in line with the rest of Holy Scripture: God's enduring love will carry us through the most horrendous persecutions and in the end love is triumphant.

Those who extrapolate messages correlating to world events today are out of sync with the orthodox reading of Scripture. Their blueprints and maps for disaster are erroneous.

I have a simple approach to end-time theology. Don't worry about the second coming of Christ until you've first mastered the lessons of his first coming. When we can love, care and respect one another in our diversity, when we can honor the sacredness of our planet and stop the exploitation of God's wonders, then we may be living in a utopia where the cares of tomorrow are minimized by the fullness of the life we live today.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Saturday, October 15, 2005

Telephone Text-Bibles and Translation

Published October 15, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: The Bible has been translated into text-speak, so its passages can be sent via text messaging on mobile phones. It's being touted as a way of bringing the Bible into the 21st century. In text-speak, the Bible's first line is: "In da Bginnin God cre8d da heavens & da earth." Do you agree that this is a way of bringing the holy book into the 21st century? Are you concerned that anything gets lost in translation?

A: Interestingly enough, the Armenian Church celebrates the 1,600th anniversary of the founding of the Armenian alphabet this month. Pontiffs and exhibits have been featured in stories in the Glendale News-Press.

The entire reason and purpose of inventing an Armenian alphabet was to translate the Holy Scriptures into words that would be understandable to a people.

The Church took a leading role in transmitting the faith to its congregation.

Text-speak Bibles are an attempt at popularizing the sacred. From the several Bible verses I have seen in text-speak, it seems this is an issue of spelling, rather than translation. I'm more concerned with the sacredness of the text being lost than I am with the message.

Many people, with impure approaches, have extrapolated misconstrued messages even from the most beautiful, articulate and concise translations. But in terms of sacredness, is it really necessary to flash the content of scripture on cell phone screens?

Although we say that God is everywhere, arguably there are certain spaces that are more sacred than others to celebrate, worship or even communicate.

A simple church, the open skies, or a majestic sunset will always inspire the soul to spirituality much better than, say, an outhouse or the city dump.

Most everything we do has been reduced to the mundane. Holy Scripture should lift us from our routine to the exceptional so that God becomes for us that special entity that consumes and renews us.

FR. VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Saturday, October 8, 2005

Bono and U2: Between Rock and a Hard Place


Published October 8, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: Rock star Bono has been criticized and praised for the spiritual messages in his band U2's music. What do you think? And in a broader sense, can rock stars/pop stars teach us something about faith?

A: If mathematics is the language by which we understand God, certainly music is the means of harmonizing with God's essence. A tune or melody can speak directly to the soul and unlock some of the deepest emotions of spirituality in us. All religious orders have effectively used the power of music to deliver their message and connect their followers with higher understanding. Chants and hymns have developed out of the religious community, while composers and artists have delivered messages through their creations.
An opera or a cantata communicates truths that may be based on the artist's, such as Bach's, world view, but is delivered personally by music that resonates to the individual soul.

Bono is effectively communicating his views through his music. Whether he's pretentious or sincere is not judgment call we need to make. U2's music is stimulating the senses while his lyrics are exciting the soul to look beyond its self and understand the problems of the community. Disease, hunger and war are universal problems and the spiritual answers to end them are inside each of us.

Remember that Rock and Roll evolved out of a rebellion against a corrupt and hypocritical establishment. The struggle continues and the religious community needs to commend and appreciate those who can rise above the mundane and address societal concerns. Those who have done so for me include John Lennon, Ian Anderson, Joan Baez and Steven Stills. And today, I'm pleased that groups such as System of a Down are able to rally the masses with their call for justice, human rights, equality and liberty for the oppressed. Here we are witnessing the responsible use of talent, coupled with the energy and spirit of music to touch the souls and spirits of people.

Fr. Vazken Movsesian
Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Saturday, October 1, 2005

Should "sins" of mothers affect the child?


Published October 1, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: A 14-year-old girl in Ontario was reportedly expelled from a Christian school last week because her parents are lesbians. What do you think of this decision?

A: This is a freedom of expression issue. The school is freely expressing itself through its policies while the couple does the same by placing (and now removing without contest) the student at this school.

When incidents such as this occur, we need to discuss the bigger issues which are touching and shaping our society. In this case, we should look at the proliferation of private schools, which is an indictment of the public school system. Isn't it odd that a lesbian couple would place their student in a school which is intolerant of their lifestyle?Obviously, they're doing so for reasons other than dogmatic ones. I venture to say that many families who opt for a private school do so for the structure (discipline) and environment (safety) that they do not find in the public system.

Rather than spending our resources on debating whether the words "under God" should be recited in the school, or whether the cross should be depicted on the seal, or what constitutes domestic partnership, we should be looking at the underlying themes that are the foundation of all true religions. God is much more than a word to be feared; it is the power of love. The cross is not just a symbol but a way of life defined by sacrifice. Partnership is a commitment.

Neither the lesbian couple nor the school was slighted in this story. You can only feel bad for the student and other children who get caught in debates rather than understanding. If anything is to come of this story, it should be a look at our public policies, starting at the school level, and find how respect, tolerance, understanding and cooperation are not specific to sexual rights, but are the basis for our growth as a society.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

St. Peter Armenian Church and Youth Ministries Center

Glendale

Saturday, September 17, 2005

Having Faith in Government

Published September 17, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: Senate hearings were held on President Bush's nomination of John Roberts as the next chief justice of the United States Supreme Court. Should Roberts' religious leanings affect his jurisprudence and/or be a part of the debate over his appointment?

A: Of course we need to be concerned with Roberts' religious convictions.

Each person, whether they sit on the Supreme Court or in the judging booth of the local swim meet, brings their own prejudices to the bench. Some are able to control and even lose themselves, in striving for the ideal of making justice blind. These are the ones we should be calling to the judicial positions. Those that cannot, usually betray themselves and are distanced from making those decisions that affect others. In all of our dealings, our personal prejudices, shaped by our faith and convictions, play a part in the decision making process.

No matter how minute or trivial that influence may be, it behooves us to know what the variables are.

When you look at the events in the world today, it is easy to be critical of religion and religious convictions. After all, we see all the misunderstanding, the intolerance, hatred and distain for one another based on a my-God-is-better-than-yourgod mentality. But by the same token, it is important to remember most of the best expressions of love and care have evolved from religious thought and the faith community.

Blind justice is the ideal. Our goal is to come as close to it as possible.

On a personal level though, I would hope that justice could be dished out with compassion for the weak. That personal prejudice would show throw and rule me out of the justice game.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Saturday, September 10, 2005

Hurricane Devastation: Why?

Published September 10, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: Why does God allow such horrors as Hurricane Katrina to happen?

A: I remember in 1988 when a devastating earthquake claimed 50,000-plus lives in Armenia this question was repeatedly asked of me by my parishioners.

Ever since, I've been sensitive to its call in the face of calamity; this year in particular following the tsunami and now hurricane Katrina. Why would a loving and caring God allow pain and suffering?

This would be a legitimate question to ask if we thought of God as the Grand Puppeteer in the sky who plays us as pawns in the everlasting chess game of life. But for us as Christians, the model of and definition of God is much different. We understand God as love. Love is all-powerful, but not in the superman sense. He can't change the course of mighty rivers nor can he bend steel with his bare hands.

We live in an imperfect world. It is plagued with hurricanes, earthquakes and violence. These things we define as manifestations of evil. By the same token we define the outward acts of charity, care and benevolence as manifestations of good. We therefore find the presence of God in these acts.

We find him in the compassion and care that the world is now extending to the hurting children. Look for him in the hearts of people, who are writing checks, leaving their homes to work in the streets of New Orleans, reaching out to help others. Ask not the question, "why evil?" but, "why good?" And you'll find God, as the source of something much more powerful than the tragedies of this world.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Saturday, August 27, 2005

Hollywood Bias? Finding Faith on Big & Small Screens

Published August 27, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: There's a new movement underway to train Christians to be film and television executives. The move is apparently in reaction to a perceived bigotry in Hollywood toward Christianity. A new program called Act One, run by Barbara Nicolosi, trains Christians to become television and film executives. It includes a three-month-long program that places Christians in entertainment internships while hosting lectures by industry professionals. First off, do you think there is a bias in Hollywood that works against Christians? And if so, can a program like this reverse that bigotry?

A: It is more than a perceived bias against Christians and I don't think there's any other group that would tolerate the blatant stereotyping that goes on against them on the big screen.

Unfortunately, we're caught in a vicious circle where the right is defining Christianity and the left is reacting to that definition and the middle is lost.

There is more to Christianity than what the right represents, but for obvious reasons of profit and greed, the sensational messages get the space and time media. Case in point, last week the Pope made an historic trip to Germany and spoke of respect and tolerance. Meanwhile, here in the states, Pat Robertson called for the assassination of the Venezuelan President. When all the dust settled, what is remembered by the press? Which message becomes the topic of the media and the people? Whose Christianity is taken to task?

I'm pleased that Barbara Nicolosi has taken the step to form Act One. In particular, I appreciate her approach, because the message of Christ is not one to be compromised. It is not a message that belongs only to Christians, but a message that can have global implications for peace. Films and television shape and define much of our society and the need to abandon stereotypes for messages of hope and the good is essential.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Friday, August 19, 2005

Finding Common Ground in Church Attendance

Published August 19, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: In his book, "Why Men Hate Going to Church," author David Murrow says that though 90% of American men say they believe in God, only two out of six attend church. His theory is that even though some could argue religious leadership is dominated by men, attending services is seen as a feminine endeavor -- with services and messages that cater to feminine values. Ultimately, Murrow calls for leaders to seek more men, or reap the consequences of religious institutions losing a generation of boys -- which will lead to the downfall of churches. Is there a dearth of men in your church? Do you agree with Murrow?

A: I haven't noticed a lack of men in our particular church, neither on a given
Sunday morning nor in the active administrative life of the church. Quite honestly, though, we haven't studied this dimension of our congregation make-up in our church.

However, I won't hesitate to say that Murrow's on target with his observations, mostly due to the manner in which religion is understood these days. The strength of religion is found in terms of its calming and pacifying ability, rather than as a vehicle to effectuate change in our lives and in society.

In the Christian tradition, Jesus Christ is in fact a revolutionary who bucks the system and taps into an inner power to overcome the greatest of difficulties. His message, "Courage, I have overcome the world" (John 16) is a victory declaration. He is a masculine role model who can be very attractive to males in their quest for power.

Many times these days, however, he's presented as a victim of circumstance, with very little control over what the fates would dish out to him. You're more inclined to pity him than mimic. This is hardly a masculine role model: a male giving up control? The Christian church has fallen lax in its presentation of Jesus.

Think of the anti-war and civil rights movements of the 60's, where the Church was at the forefront of the challenge to bring peace. Yet today, sadly, the Church is staying silent, not really defining itself as an institution with the ability to bring about true and lasting peace. More than blaming its inability to attract a male audience, its loss of relevance in the lives of people, is the greater downfall for the institution.

Let people understand that religion taps into the deepest and most sensitive parts of human consciousness and watch the pews fill with men and women, because you've offered something that goes beyond gender.

Fr. Vazken Movsesian
Armenian Church Youth Ministries


Friday, August 12, 2005

Should "Intelligent Design" be taught in school?

Published August 12, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: President Bush last week told reporters that "intelligent design" -- that life is so complex that a higher power must have created it -- should be discussed alongside evolution when teaching about the origins of life. Do you agree?

A: Intelligent design should not be taught in schools. It should, however, be introduced and explained as the means by which people have answered the questions: Where did we come from? And, where are we going? The same should hold true for other systems of definitions, such as Creation.

"Intelligent design" is a politically correct way of saying God.

It is a matter of faith whether one believes or does not believe in a creator.

Personally, I believe that the world as we know it today, with its various species and life forms, has evolved from primitive times. I do not accept that this same life happened purely by chance. Neither do the great scientists and thinkers of our time. It was Albert Einstein who mentioned that God "does not play dice with the universe." Alexander Solzhenitsyn challenged the greatest scientists of our times to the impossible task of creating even one single feather in a test tube!

Yes, there is a design and there is a motive. I feel comfortable referring to the Creator as God. I arrive at this conclusion, not because it was taught to me in school, but rather I had the opportunity to know, learn and come to my own conclusions. I wish the same for our children today.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Saturday, July 30, 2005

Is summertime good for the soul?

Published July 30, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: In a new book, "Summer: A Spiritual Biography of the Seasons," editor Gary Schmidt and illustrator Susan Felch present writings from several authors about the cathartic value of summertime -- its ability to spiritually heal and renew, and to allow people to value time.

Do you agree? Is there something about summertime that can renew us, even in a spiritual sense?

A: The warmth of the summer months lends itself nicely to a period of renewal.

It is during these months that we seek recreation, that is, a means to re-create ourselves and our lives.

Interestingly enough, in the ancient Armenian Church the summer months are dedicated to renewal and rejuvenation. It is the season during which we celebrate the Assumption of the Virgin Mary, recalling how she was assumed into a new and everlasting life. As the "Life-bearer," St. Mary holds a unique spot in the tradition of the church. She gives humanity a chance to renew itself in its quest for peace.

Unique to the Armenian Church liturgies is a tradition of blessing grapes.

This ceremony takes place during August. The fruits of the fields and the products of labor are blessed. During this service, families are invited to renew themselves internally and to their community. Following the biblical metaphor of a branch producing fruit only when it is united to the vine, in the same manner people find the fullness of life only when connected to the source of their spirituality, that is, God.

These traditions have their roots during the hot summer months for many reasons, primarily because of the intensity of heat and light which comes to us during summer. Happy re-creation!

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Saturday, July 23, 2005

Recliners or pews?

Published July 23, 2005

IN THEORY

Q: A new form of worshiping God is emerging. It involves using images that flash across big video screens and flashy music that caters to young evangelicals -- reportedly called "the Emerging Church." In one reported case, church members meet in the round and sit in couches and recliners instead of pews. The movement has been called an effort to spread the gospel to those who feel alienated from current and traditional forms of worship. But some worry that this movement, which is finding new ways to "experience" faith and interpret its tenets, could lead to people leaving faiths and the tenets of those faiths altogether. What do you think?

A: Mine is not to criticize another person's form of worship. Means by which people approach the sacred vary and, like all art forms, find their validity in the eye (or soul) of the beholder.

Forms of worship do not change or alter the message. The Christian message was, is and will always be the same: Love is the path for our physical and spiritual salvation.

The Armenian Church as an ancient Orthodox church has been criticized from within for its long liturgical worship forms. Contemporary means and approaches to worship have long been debated within the church ranks. And as a youth outreach leader I am especially sensitive to the issues of liturgical reform.

In our experience, we have found the answers in our roots. We are called an "Apostolic" church because we trace our lineage to the Apostle Thaddeus, but even more important, we celebrate our Christian experience in the same manner as the Apostles. That is, the worship and community life are centered around the sacrament of the Eucharist, which is the outward expression of love.

Through the years, we've discovered what we all have always known. People don't choose one church over another because of music, décor, programs, etc. Rather, they are looking for a place where they are loved and can love.

Jesus Christ was the first pastor to offer this in his church. The apostles did the same. The challenge is now passed along to us. If flashing videos, projected pictures and deejay music are the lure, their enduring power will be tested by the message they herald. There is no alternative to an environment based on love.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Saturday, July 16, 2005

Reconciling Death in the Name of Religion

Published July 16, 2005

IN THEORY

Reconciling Death in the Name of Religion

Q: How do you reconcile death from terrorism -- terrorism in the name of religion -- with religion? That is, how can we believe in a religion, when so many have died in the name of it?

A: Religion celebrates life. It does not destroy it. Religion fills the emptiness in life as the soul looks for companionship with something higher than itself. To believe that religion advocates the destruction of life contradicts the very definition of religion and ultimately humanity.

Yes, even the myths that make up so much of religious folklore, need to be placed in context of their times and circumstances. To believe that a god will destroy the crowning point of his creation is archaic. These stories give rise to justifications for hatred, judgment, rape, slaughter and murder.

Our world has never had the means and the technology available, as it does today, to resolve every issue in a peaceful manner. It is the spirit of pride and hatred that moves people to eschew peaceful means and opt for violence.

Love has to be, and can only be, the guiding force behind all religion.

Where there is love, there cannot be violence. Violence can never be called in the name of religion.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Saturday, July 9, 2005

Should clergy shape war policy?

Published July 9, 2005 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Should clergy shape war policy?

Q: The National Council of Churches, an ecumenical group of Christian denominations, this week announced a declaration urging President Bush to develop a timetable for the withdrawal of troops from Iraq and to reevaluate his policy on Iraq, which they say has failed. They also urged him to listen to a wider pool of religious advisors on the issue.

Do you agree with their declaration? And can/should religious advisors play a role in war policy?

A: Better late than never.

Religious leadership must always present the highest of ideals and ask/demand that society strive for them. If religious leaders took on the task of speaking out for justice, yes, President Bush -- and even more, our country -- would be better served with an expanded pool of religious advisors.

The saddest people in life are those who have no hope for tomorrow. Religion weaves the dreams of hope and it is up to society to wake up to actualize those dreams.

The most pressing dream of our day is that of peace. War robs the world of hope and, therefore, religion must talk the language of peace. It behooves every religious leader to guide and direct people toward the ideals -- truth, justice, freedom -- that bring peace.

It is about time the National Council of Churches came out with this call.

FR. VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Friday, July 1, 2005

Contemplating the Court on Commandments

Contemplating the Court on Commandments

Q: The Supreme Court this week ruled that displays of the Ten Commandments on government property are not inherently unconstitutional. In essence, the justices ruled 5 to 4 in two cases that each case of alleged governmental promotion of religion by displaying the Ten Commandments needs to be examined on its own. In one case, they ruled that the Ten Commandments could not be displayed, because they go too far in endorsing religion. In another other, they ruled that it could be, on historical grounds. The decision has brought criticism on the grounds that a case-by-case look is not a principle that can be applied consistently. Observers also say it doesn't settle the role of religion in society. What do you think of the court's decision?

A:The court skirted the bigger issue and gave a ruling that the Ten Commandments may be displayed inconspicuously among other documents and monuments.

Coincidently, God and religion were inconspicuously placed among other news items that captured the nation's attention this week. President Bush spoke to us, called for the continuance of the war and ended his words with "God bless you all." At the same time, we were introduced to the bigger war, the "War of the Worlds," and we were given a dose of Scientology along with the review of Tom Cruise acting.

In essence, the Supreme Court followed the patterns of society.

This weekend, we celebrate the founding of this incredible country, the United States of America. The name of our country invokes something in each of our souls. Our country was founded on a dream and continues to define itself as it evolves through a process. God was not something etched in stone back in 1776; neither was religion. The Founding Fathers had a notion that God was the underlying force for what we refer to as liberty, peace and freedom. These terms are not abstract, nor can they be placed inconspicuously in the corners of our lives.

I wish the court had ruled more decisively. But my greater desire is that we as a society can not be afraid of these terms that point us to our ideals.

Words are etched in stone, but our challenge is to etch them in our hearts.

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Friday, June 24, 2005

Finding a seat in the Lord's Kitchen

Published June 24, 2005

IN THEORY

Finding a seat in the Lord's Kitchen

Q:A policy at the Salvation Army's Lord's Kitchen, which feeds the homeless, required patrons to present identification and proof that they live in Glendale in order to get a meal. The policy was reversed temporarily this week after sparking controversy locally, even on the Forum pages of the News-Press. Some feel the policy was justified. Others felt it was wrong, because they say it belied core Christian values. What do you think? Do you agree with the decision to reverse it?

A:One of the more familiar miracles of Jesus involves feeding 5,000 people by multiplying a couple of fish and few loaves of bread. At the end of the feed, Jesus walks away from the crowd because their appreciation is misdirected (John 6:15). They were so awestruck by the physical feat and the satisfaction it brought to their bodies that they were in danger of missing the bigger menu item, which provided food for their souls and spirit.

As implied by its name, the Salvation Army has an evangelical mission. It seems that the policy changes might have been more in line with their overall mission rather than an act of discrimination against people who aren't from Glendale. Similar to what happened after the feeding of the 5,000, people may need to be reminded that there is a bigger picture that escapes our focus.

The events of the last week need to serve as a wake-up call to our entire community. First, we cannot escape the reality that homelessness is real and there is a need to address issues of shelter and food here in Glendale. Second, there are different ways of addressing those needs. Whether we provide the proverbial fish or teach a person to fish, both are necessary and both are valid means to an end. Third, the challenges presented to us belong to all of us. It is not only a shame but a disgrace on our city that in all this abundance even one person should go without food.

Finally, as a community we need to commend and more importantly support houses of worship that are involved in the outward care of others. This, in fact, is at the core and foundation of all true religions. As Saint John wrote, "He who does not love his brother whom he has seen, cannot love God whom he has not seen."

FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN

Armenian Church

Youth Ministries

Friday, June 10, 2005

On the visit of Catholicos Karekin II

Published June 10, 2005 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Times

Special Edition of "In Theory"

A visit of hope and reverence

In this week's In Theory, Vazken Movsesian of St. Peter Armenian Church & Youth Ministries'' Center reflects on His Holiness Karekin II's visit to Glendale. Karekin II is the spiritual and administrative head of the Armenian Church, a position that is akin to that of the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church. Regular In Theory contributors will return next week.

As a young Latina girl stood up to receive a blessing from His Holiness Karekin II, the staff at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles drew near to them. It didn't occur to her that this man had traveled halfway around the globe, from a landlocked country called Armenia, to be here. She looked at him with a warm smile, one that could have melted the coldest heart. But there was no need to soften anything or anyone that day.

Amid the disease and illness, hope and love radiated. And even though she didn't understand every word spoken by the Armenian pontiff, she knew exactly what was happening. Along with thousands of Southern Californians, she had been moved by the whisper of prayer and a personal blessing by a man of God.

Karekin II, the Catholicos of the Armenian Church is visiting his flock on the West Coast. He and his entourage of black-robed priests and bishops have been calling on churches, hospitals and schools. His message has been the same: thank God for the opportunities granted to you in America; live in harmony with your neighbors and remember your roots. It's a message that transcends ethnicity, social status and language.

His Holiness Karekin II is the spiritual and administrative head of the Armenian Church, which makes this visit especially significant. Southern California, and in particular the city of Glendale, is home to one of the largest concentrations of Armenians outside of Armenia. His title is Supreme Patriarch and Catholicos of All Armenians. As the name implies, his office is both religious and national. It's a position that is akin to that of the Pope of the Roman Catholic Church, with the added responsibility of carrying national dreams and aspirations.

The Armenian Church is Apostolic, with a tradition that can be traced back 2,000 years to the time of Christ and his apostles. It was the Apostle Thaddeus who brought the Christian message of love and hope to Armenia in the first century. Later, he was joined by the Apostle Bartholomew.

These two ambassadors of life were part of the original group of 12 disciples who had been commissioned by Jesus to go to all lands and preach the Gospel. Just as Peter went to Rome and established the church there, it was Thaddeus who came to Armenia. And just as Benedict XVI is the successor of the Apostle Peter, Karekin II is the 142nd successor to the apostolic throne of Thaddeus and Bartholomew.

It was at the turn of the 4th century, however, when Gregory, called "the Illuminator," converted the Armenian king Tirtad to Christianity. By decree of the king, Armenia became the first nation to accept Christianity as a state religion in 301 A.D. Gregory brought structure to the Church and became the first "Catholicos" of the Armenian Church. The word "Etchmiadzin" literally means "descent of the only-begotten," in reference to Gregory's vision, where Jesus pointed to the site of the Armenian Church.

Until today, Etchmiadzin serves as the headquarters of the Armenian Apostolic Church. It is autonomous of any other church body and has its own ecclesiastical structure. Worldwide, there are churches in more than 40 countries. True to apostolic tradition, the Armenian Church has three main orders: bishops, priests and deacons. For unique and historical reasons, the Armenian Church also has another Catholicos in Lebanon, a Patriarch in the Holy City of Jerusalem and in Istanbul (Constantinople), each with distinct geographical jurisdictions. California is part of the Western Diocese, with its Primate Archbishop Hovnan Derderian, who is hosting the Catholicos' visit.

Of the 7.5 million Armenians throughout the world, the vast majority have been baptized and confirmed in the Armenian Apostolic Church, making them spiritual members of the largest Armenian structure and the oldest Christian tradition.

The Catholicos represents the Armenian Church, the Holy See, Apostolic succession, and like all priests, the message of Jesus Christ. His highest calling is that of a Christian.

My ministry as a priest of the Armenian Church takes me to the youth. I work with kids who have issues with identity and self-respect. I see what intolerance and rejection can do to a person, and, even worse, to the community. The solutions that are presented to our youth by the well-meaning, but sometimes self-serving leadership, ushers in new situations, which can be more devastating than the original problems.

Today, materialism is giving our youth false hopes for tomorrow. The lure of wealth and the illusion of its easy acquisition is sending youth in an empty and futile search for happiness. Finally, violence -- whether on a video screen, on the street or on the battlefield -- is being accepted as the only means of conflict resolution.

To all of this, I thank God for Karekin II's visit. He comes with a message. It is a message of hope, of faith and of love. He is a living witness to the enduring power of good in the face of adversity and even death. For in fact, since Armenians embraced Christianity, they have rarely seen any time of peace. Intolerant and brutal neighboring nations have tried to impose their will and control over Armenians. The nation and people of Armenia have experienced wars, invasions and even an attempt at genocide in 1915, but continue to survive.

Perhaps the greatest legacy of this trip will be that of understanding.

Karekin II is here to understand the sufferings of his people, to give hope and bear witness to resurrection beyond suffering. Once criticized for wearing ornate vestments and gold jewelry while his people faced hunger and war, a 13th-century Catholicos removed his shirt to expose a burlap tunic against his body. He explained it was important that his people believe in the greater good, in the victory of good over evil, and therefore his outward appearance was necessary for the morale of the nation. But personally, against his body, the Catholicos felt the pain and suffering of his people.

Understanding works both ways, and this visit also brings understanding to the community at large. Many times in our zeal to express our personhood, we find reasons that separate us rather than those that bind us together. Our beautiful community is plagued by intolerance. Tensions flare over misunderstandings and miscommunications. Most of our problems can be resolved and overcome with a simple look at others -- to realize that we have more in common with one another than at difference.

As the head of the Armenian Church, he's here as a reminder of the past. The populations that have come to inhabit the Southland are here with a basic need for self-expression. Their homelands have been destroyed by the ravages of war, hatred and poverty. When we view a recent immigrant we are only looking at our own past -- our parents and grandparents -- who came to this country accepting the invitation inscribed on that great statue, "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses, yearning to breath free...." In our understanding of the past, we learn to work in harmony with one another.

And so at every opportunity, at every juncture, whether with the students at Glendale High, with the patients at Memorial Hospital or with the caregivers at the new wing of Glendale Adventist Medical Center, His Holiness speaks with apostolic authority, asking for loyalty to and blessings on this great land of America. As for success and to conquer life's challenges, he gives a simple and basic formula of faith, hard work and love in the heart.

Our community has been touched by a man of God. He is the Armenian Catholicos with a universal message about a divine love. Now it's up to us to listen, react and move our life forward in peace and harmony.

http://www.glendalenewspress.com/religion/story/15662p-21797c.html

Photo courtesy of Western Diocese