Extending one’s handouts

Published December 1, 2007 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time IN THEORY Extending one’s handouts Q: Steve Burger, a former director of the Assn. of Gospel Rescue Missions, says Americans should not hand out money to homeless people on the street, but to rather donate to local food or shelter agencies. Burger reportedly believes that giving handouts promotes destructive behavior among the homeless. What do you think? A: Last year Warren Buffett made headlines when he changed his will to distribute his wealth through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Buffett cited different reasons for this decision, among them that the Gates Foundation already had the infrastructure in place to “productively” distribute the funds in a manner that was in accord with his wish. In the same manner, by giving through a reputable charity, you’re letting those who have the means and facilities to distribute in a fair manner, do so efficiently and productively. Sure, you can go down the street passing out money, but it’s not the most efficient way of distributing the wealth. It forces you into a position of judgment to deem someone as impoverished or needy; plus you have to account for human dignity, which is diminished on the side of the receiver. On top of it all, it’s very easy to let personal pride step in and distort the nature of your good work. For these reasons, we encourage our congregation to be generous in their giving through the programs we have in place. All reputable charities maintain databases and have accounting systems that ensure money is distributed in a productive manner. Caring for those who cannot otherwise take care of themselves is the cornerstone of all good religion. In fact, how a religion addresses the problems of poverty and alleviating human suffering should serve as a measure to the holiness of that faith. As Saint John writes in his letter, “for those who do not love a brother or sister whom they have seen, cannot love God whom they have not seen.” (1John 4:20 New Revised Standard Version). And tangible manifestations of that love are most prominently expressed in our giving. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church Youth Ministries In His Shoes Mission

Published November 24, 2007 IN THEORY The Gravitational Poll Q: U.S. Catholic bishops this week reportedly approved new moral guidelines for Catholic voters warning that their political choices could impact a person’s salvation. Bishops reportedly stress that the guidelines are not a voter guide, but rather they represent a moral framework for believers. Still, some bishops disagree that voting choices can affect someone’s salvation. The church reportedly believes it is a “formal cooperation in evil” to vote for a candidate for the sole reason that he or she supports “intrinsic evils” such as abortion or racism. Bishops also believe Catholics should avoid becoming one-issue voters. What do you think? Should your political choices affect your salvation? A: How refreshing to hear that the bishops, these men of faith, are standing up for what they believe. Whether you agree with the policies they are supporting, you have to appreciate that these bishops are taking their faith seriously enough to attach permanent consequences to the decision-making process. Basically, they are saying, what we believe is not something that comes alive only on Sundays and in sanctuaries, but has applications and ramifications in all of life. By taking a very extreme and absurd example, this can be better understood. Imagine a candidate who supports a program of systematic annihilation of a group of people, such as in the case of genocide. Everyone who votes for this candidate knowing of his or her agenda for extermination is responsible and accountable for those actions. Therefore, wouldn’t we all agree that those voters would be guilty of the same crime? This may seem severe, but that is the seriousness of our vote. Sometimes in discussing a person’s “right to vote” we fail to speak of the “responsibility of the vote.” Every right carries a responsibility. The bishops are merely saying that if a person adheres to a set of principles and standards, there is a responsibility to live according to those tenets of faith. In my particular belief system, the standard to love, as expressed through Jesus Christ, is so high that my voting decisions must reflect that standard. The way I see it, expressing love in everything we do is the responsibility of those who have the right to be called Christian. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church Youth Ministries In His Shoes Mission

Picket Fences Built Hatefully

Published November 10, 2007 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time IN THEORY Picket Fences Built Hatefully Q: Despite a $10.9-million jury award against him this week for picketing at a funeral of a soldier who died in Iraq, Pastor Fred Phelps and his church in Kansas will reportedly not be deterred from picketing military funerals with anti-gay slogans — claiming that deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan are God’s punishment for homosexuality. They hold up signs that say things like “God hates fags,” which Phelps says is a way to continue his struggle against what he and his followers say is an immoral lifestyle. Others say Phelps is practicing a “hateful ideology.” What do you think? And what kind of message do you think Phelps’ actions sends to the faith community? A: This is a no-brainer. The message Phelps and his gang is spewing is despicable and obscene. It shows absolutely no respect for the sanctity of life and therefore can’t possibly be considered coming from a “church.” And as we know, a religion based on fear can only motivate and attract people for all the wrong reasons. Nevertheless, his message is protected by the Constitution, the same Constitution that allows us to preach and proclaim the truths we expound in the name of religion. We’ve seen this tested over and over. I remember in the late 1970s when American Nazis tried to march through Skokie, Ill., primarily because of the large Jewish population and Holocaust survivors living there. It was the American Civil Liberties Union that went to bat for the Nazis. All in the name of this freedom, which continues to be used and abused by the U.S. population. This last month, I personally felt the hate speech that was spewed out against the Armenians by challenges to the reality of genocide (in reference to H.R. 106). I heard the obscenities spoken against my faith, by the likes of Kathy Griffin in her infamous Emmy acceptance speech. These examples are completely in line with Phelps and his followers. As upset and disgusted as I get, I know the answer is not to ban this speech. This freedom is the foundation of our society, and that freedom is sacred. It is sad and sickening that people abuse freedom. What the faith community must do in these instances is to focus on the greater ideals that we serve. If we are convinced that goodness always triumphs over evil, we need to combat hatred, as difficult as it may be, with acts and words of love. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Published October 27, 2007 IN THEORY Churches say Halo to kids Q: Pastors and ministers at churches across the country are reportedly using a violent video game, Halo 3, to reach young congregants. Ministers have held Halo nights, in which they use the game to attract youths. If young people stay to play the game, pastors hope youngsters will also stay for the biblical message. The first-person shooter game, which is rated M for mature audiences, depicts a cybernetically enhanced super soldier shooting at alien invaders in a lethal attempt to save Earth. Critics, including religious ethicists, say the approach to using the game for ministry could have a negative effect on children, because it connects the thrill and arousal with killing. What do you think? Do you agree with this approach to furthering a ministry? A: I definitely have a problem with the violence aspect of these games. While correlations to actual violence are always questionable, depending on whose statistic you follow, at the very least they desensitize us to violence, suffering and death. And since the church is that place which should uphold the sanctity of life, these games should not be endorsed by the church. But I have a bigger issue with this practice of deceptive marketing. Whether you use the Halo video or a standard game of basketball to bring youths (or people) in with the intention of giving them something else, shows a lack of confidence in your product. This bait-and-switch practice is used by different businesses to lure people to their showrooms. Think of the paid trips to exotic locations, which are given away just to have us listen to a 90-minute high-pressure sales pitch for a time-share. Or the one car that is offered below wholesale price and somehow is always sold before we get to the lot, just to lure us to a particular dealership. Wouldn’t you think that if these companies believed that their product had the quality and worth that they purport they do, they could bring us into their store on merit alone? I think the same is true for religious groups. When they appeal to these campaigns to recruit people, it’s a signal that says, “We don’t believe in our product, so we need to trick you in through the door with something else.” Reflecting on Jesus and his call to people, it was a straight-forward invitation to follow him. He never sugar-coated the invitation; in fact, just the opposite, “If any want to become my followers, let them deny themselves and take up their cross and follow me.” (New Revised Standard Version, Matthew 16:24) Sure, not everyone followed and “. . . because of this many of his disciples turned back and no longer went about with him.” (John 6:66); nevertheless, he kept his message as the center of his invitation. As ministers of the Gospel, we’re commissioned to do the same. Keeping Christ’s message of love and hope at the center of our invitation is the greatest call to the faith. FATHER VAZKEN MOVSESIAN Armenian Church Youth Ministries

Musings about a resolution on Ramadan

Published October 13, 2007

IN THEORY

Musings about a resolution on Ramadan

Q:

A congressional resolution recognizing the Islamic holy month of Ramadan as important is reportedly being touted by U.S. Muslims as an important sign that they are gaining acceptance in America and becoming part of the fabric of the country. But Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., argued that the resolution is nothing more than an example of political correctness, which he reportedly said has captured the political and media elite in the U.S. What do you think?.

A:

A congressional resolution recognizing Ramadan is certainly an act of political correctness, but then again, so are all these types of resolutions. What else can you say about them? It’s not like they’re advocating one belief system over another, they merely recognize a portion of reality. In so doing, they’re bringing a level of comfort to members of our community — other Americans.

We need to stop being scared to face reality.

There is a sizable Muslim population in America. And the beauty of America and her “dream” is that there is room for everyone in this country. I have heard the argument that “those countries” would never allow or grant non-Islamic minorities the equal status or recognition with the mainstream religion.

But to me, that’s exactly the point.

We are not like the other countries. That’s what makes America great: its ability to incorporate so many into something greater than the components that make it up.

Ironically, this week’s news headlines pointed to another recognition resolution regarding the Armenian Genocide.

We witnessed the sad demonstration of denial by the political establishment, the president included, which wanted to compromise truth and justice for the sake of politics.

You can’t escape the reality of an organized, systematic annihilation of one group of people by a government. Its called genocide.

And a great country like America, with all of its greatness, cannot be intimidated to not speak the truth.

Fr. Vazken Movsesian

Armenian Church

In His Shoes Mission

Toys of Biblical Proportions

Published September 22, 2007 IN THEORY Toys of Biblical Proportions Q: Wal-Mart is test-marketing biblical action figures - Jesus, Moses, Mary, Noah, David and Samson among them. And Target will do the same on its website. There is at least some concern, however, among consumers - parents - that such figures may prompt children to equate biblical heroes and heroines with secular figures. And while some may see the action figures as a learning tool, others may see them as gag gifts. What do you think of the idea of biblical action figures? A: There are few things that irritate me more than a plastic Jesus. I can't speak for the other "action figures" but when it comes to Jesus, I wish they would leave him alone. It's bad enough that most people have an image of God as an old man in the sky ready to swoop down to save us from ourselves, smack the bad guys on the head and reward the good with homes behind pearly gates. He's become a combination of Superman and Santa Claus. And when He doesn't deliver, watch out! We become unforgiving and take our "business" elsewhere. Now, imagine God sitting on a shelf at Target or Wal-Mart. I can't. In the Armenian Orthodox tradition, we reference God as "Khorhoort" which literally means, "Mystery." He is inscrutable. Why do the spires of our churches reach up to the heavens, beyond where our vision can take us? How can we then presume to contain in words, images or plastic models His essence? A bend-him-up Jesus will only further confuse a population who needs to find the essence of Love rather than a message of might-is-right. But alas, capitalism does rule the day and there is no doubt in my mind that if there is a profit margins then there will be no stopping Wal-Mart, Sears, Target, Mattel or Hasbro (just to name the tip of the iceberg). Last year when talking to a group of kids at Burbank High School about their values, I brought it to their attention that most of our ideas are shaped by models presented to us by the media. A couple of teachers were shocked when I suggested that in America, money is even more powerful than God. Tragically, we keep seeing it over and over. Plastic Jesuses are not created to teach values, morals or even religion. They are created to make a quick buck. Fr. Vazken Movsesian Armenian Church In His Shoes Mission

Cyber Confessions

Published September 7, 2007 - Glendale News Press - Los Angeles Time

IN THEORY

Cyber Confessions

Q:

Websites to confess sins are reportedly becoming more popular in a society that has moved away from traditional modes of confession, such as one-on-one meetings with priests. Sites such as IveScrewedUp.com, DailyConfession.com, absolution-online.com, and MySecret.tv offer ways for sinners to confess. At the same time, on-line confession sites reportedly give churches a vehicle to get people in contact with faith.

What do you think of these new cyber-hubs for confession? Do they bring people closer to religion?

A:

Confession is part of a healing process for an individual who has been plagued with the burdens of wrongdoing. If you take the old adage, "Confession is good for the soul" then it really should not matter where the confession takes place so long as it is done. Cyberspace grants us the ultimate in anonymity and that in itself can make for a very comfortable confessional.

But confession is only one part of the healing process. The other important step is penance, that is, a means by which the individual makes amends. That’s where religion comes in. Because while confession is individual in scope, the process of penance operates in the context of community.

I think the bigger issues in this story are the boundaries that are being stretched by technology. Virtual confession booths push yet one more time the religious community to adapt to the lifestyle of its congregants. People need healing. True healing begins with aligning ourselves with God. If a computer and keyboard help in that alignment process, then let’s use it. But at the same time, let’s create those spaces and environments that are not judging, that are caring and provide for community.

Fr. Vazken Movsesian

Armenian Church

In His Shoes Mission